Hummingbirds in Wyoming

/

Iridescent. Casper Mountain, Wyoming. May 2025.
Nikon Z8 with AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR at 1/2000 sec, f/5.6, ISO 12800.

This week we take a break from our usual assortment of neglected structures for something completely different. After our few days in Cheyenne (covered in the last two posts) we spent a week up on Casper Mountain. The house/cabin we rented was well-equipped with hummingbird feeders and no shortage of hummingbirds. I’ve gotten a smattering of decent hummingbird images over the years, including a few on Vancouver Island featured in a post last year, but having the chance to work with them across a number of days really helped get some good results.

I think the image above sets a new high-ISO record for me, at least for an image worth having. Pretty crazy.

Swan DIve. Casper Mountain, Wyoming. May 2025.
Nikon Z8 with AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR at 1/6000 sec, f/5.6, ISO 1600.

There were two species of hummingbirds at the feeders: the ones with the pink throats are called broad-tailed hummingbirds and the ones with the black throats are (unimaginatively) called black-throated hummingbirds. This little guy, below, was every bit as tiny as he looks sitting on this turnbuckle.

Breather. Casper Mountain, Wyoming. May 2025.
Nikon Z8 with AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR at 1/2000 sec, f/5.6, ISO 12800.

I enjoyed the various poses and lighting conditions that I accumulated over the week. One benefit of having multiple sessions in one location was that I started to pay more attention to the backgrounds; a distracting background really sabotages images like these.

Caffeinated. Casper Mountain, Wyoming. May 2025.
Nikon Z8 with AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR at 1/8000 sec, f/5.6, ISO 3200.

I have about 350 images of the hummingbirds from my week’s stay on the mountain. While I primarily chose this selection based on avoiding repetition, I also didn’t like having the actual birdfeeders in the imageโ€”just the birdsโ€”so I chose images where I could crop out the birdfeeder if necessary. Or, like this next one, where the birdfeeder intruded a little into the bottom right corner of the frame, I removed it with a little digital sleight of hand.

Flying Fish. Casper Mountain, Wyoming. May 2025.
Nikon Z8ย withย AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VRย at 1/6000 sec, f/5.6, ISO 1600.

Hummingbirds are undeniably fun to watch in real life, but it is also exciting to see them (mostly!) frozen in time. You can see so much detail that is impossible in real time. To me, the primary thing that a still photograph fails to capture well is the iridescence of their feathers as they move. Even so, they are definitely fascinating when rendered in a nice still image.

Hover-Craft. Casper Mountain, Wyoming. May 2025.
Nikon Z8ย withย AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VRย at 1/1500 sec, f/5.6, ISO 1600.

I hope you enjoyed this little diversion into (admittedly baited) wildlife photography. Next up on the blog will be a short series from a recent trip to Michigan, my 50th state. Michigan in the fall is special, as I will do my best to prove over the coming weeks. Thanks for following along!

If you would like to receive my weekly post as an email, please subscribe:

Categories:

Tags:


4 responses to “Hummingbirds in Wyoming”

  1. Jim, I have to say my favorite is the tiny one on the eye bolt. Of course I love them all.
    I would love a very small picture of this for Christmas. Or note cards so I could frame one.
    Love, Mom

  2. Not at all easy (as I know from less successful experience)! I’m surprised the first image, which gets the series off to an excellent start, was only 1/2000 sec.

    • Ah, the reason that 1/2000 sec did such a great job freezing the motion on the wings (most of the blur that remains is just due to depth of field) is that the wings happen to be about at the point where they are reversing their motion from going forward to going backward. So, for a brief instant, they aren’t really moving much. This happens again on the backswing, so to speak. When the wings are out sideways, their speed peaks and there is some blur which I can see on other frames in the sequence. Even so, there isn’t that much blur even then.

      In responding to your comment, I realized that I botched the shutter speeds listed on the final two images of the post, which I have now corrected. The last image has the wings closer to the midpoint of their flap and the blur is more evident.

Leave a Reply to RobW Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.