The sandhill cranes are the mainโbut not onlyโreason to visit Whitewater Draw. While the immediate area is pretty flat, there are mountains in the distance in nearly every direction. Arizona, of course, is frequently blessed with colorful skies that often can be exploited by compositions that show a lot of sky, such as the image above.
Since Whitewater Draw is one of the few places in southern Arizona with waterโalbeit ephemeralโit is also a good place to take advantage of reflections:
The preceding two images were both taken during the same two afternoon visits that I described in the previous post. The following images, in contrast, were taken during a morning visit about a year later. The big difference here is ice:
Once the sun rose a bit and the cranes had left to forage for the day, the thin patches of water on the ice still made for some interesting images even though the sky was blue:
In this environment I found my 500mm lens to be useful for isolating small details either against the water or with their reflections. Since the colors change rapidly as the sun rises, there are lots of color combinationsโand especially warm/cool contrastsโto exploit:
Before this blog moves on from Whitewater Draw, I did want to slip in one last wildlife image. Even without the sandhill cranes, Whitewater Draw is a popular birding spot: I found a species list online with just over 300 species listed. For my part I saw green-winged teals, northern shovelers, mallards, killdeers, vermillion flycatchers, white-winged doves, loggerhead shrikes, Copper’s hawks, and murmurations of yellow-headed blackbirds. And here is a Say’s phoebe:
Besides the pretty birdโwith its feathers fluffed against the coldโI like the bent twig that forms an arch above the frozen water and the shadow that stretches into the far corner of the frame. The color palette is nice, too.
Technical notes. The photographs in this post were taken with a Nikon Z7. The first photograph was taken with the very capable Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/4 S (a lens that I have since replaced with the Nikkor Z 24-120mm f/4 S). The fourth photograph was taken with the Nikkor Z 85mm f/1.8 S wide open at f/1.8 to better isolate the tree from the background; the tree is far enough away that the effect of the shallow depth of field is subtle, but still helpful. The other five photographs were taken with the AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR; obviously 500mm is not the focal length for sweeping vistas and it is used here to isolate smaller details in the landscape. All were processed from RAW in Adobe Lightroom Classic.